Cain
Knew Better.
The scriptures
are not always written in straight-forward language; after all, it’s the
pleasure of the Lord to hide a matter. Some one once suggested every scripture
contains more than 3 layers. We may not have enough time in this life to prove
that, but we do know for certain the words authored by the Lord are to be
rightly divided, and we are to find “here a little, there a little, line upon
line…”
[It
is] the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings [is] to search
out a matter.
Sometimes we
can see two solid pillars of truth in what has been written for our learning.
With study, we can carefully bridge between the two if the planks we use are
strong, and scriptural. There is a great gap in the continuing story of
original sin. Adam falls silent. In fact, little is said of him after he is
expelled from the garden. The story jumps to the birth of his first two sons,
born sometime after Adam and Eve took up their second residence.
Scripture tells
us nothing of Cain and Abel except their order of birth and that they were given
to different professions. Gen 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she
conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. 4:2
And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain
was a tiller of the ground.
And then the
story of the offerings: Gen 4:3 And in process of time it came to pass, that
Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD. 4:4
And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof.
And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering: 4:5 But unto
Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his
countenance fell. We are quick to point out the obvious in verses four and
five, that is, the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering, but not unto
Cain and his offering. Many will conclude the difference is the result of God’s
election. But that’s not the key lesson to be taken away from this story. We
always need to read God’s word carefully. A strong case can be made that Abel
is elect and Cain was not, we ought not to head to before the foundation of the
world immediately when examining these verses.
Some will argue
God didn’t respect the offering because it was from Cain, whom the scripture
says, he did not respect. We’ve heard it said Cain was lazy and brought only
that which he plucked from the ground. Others say God didn’t respect Cain’s
offering because the ground from which it came was cursed, but there’s more
going on here. In order for these two young men to bring sacrifices to God,
someone had to instruct them. They didn’t just wake up one day and decide this
would be something interesting. We can safely conclude their temperaments were
as different as their choice of livelihood. The timing of offering was not
coincidental. They had been taught.
The Lord himself
might have taught them, but in all likelihood it was our silent Adam. We know
there’s awareness involved because of the timing of the sacrifice. Cain
knew when to bring it to God. Abel knew when to bring it as well.
Someone had trained or instructed these young men on when to bring forth a
sacrifice, and what to bring. Abel brought the firstlings of the flock
and the fat thereof. There had to be an animal death involved: a blood
sacrifice. God had respect unto Abel and unto his offering. His sacrifice was
accepted. If Cain had brought the same type of sacrifice – the firstling of the
flock and the fat thereof, he too would have been accepted. That’s a bold
statement many will take immediate issue with, for elsewhere the scripture calls
Cain – that evil one.
So how do we
know that if Cain had made a blood sacrifice similar to Abel’s he would have
been accepted? God said so. Gen 4:6 And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art
thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen? Gen 4:7 If thou doest
well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the
door. And unto thee [shall be] his desire, and thou shalt rule over him. If
thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? How is it one is accepted? We
have to look to the sample given us. Abel’s offering was accepted, therefore,
he did well (was obedient) and therefore he himself was accepted.
Cain had been
instructed also, to take the firstlings of the flock and the fat thereof and
present it to the Lord on a particular day. Abel was obedient. Cain was not.
In fact, we have to conclude Cain was knowingly disobedient. Not only did he
refuse to take a lamb, (it’s no stretch to make the sacrifice a lamb) he
deliberately took fruit from the ground that God had cursed as an affront to the
Lord. He offered him cursed goods in a mocking manner.
Cain is the
first human ever born to earthly parents. He is the first to receive Adam’s
fallen nature and the first ever to inherit total depravity. In this sacrifice
Cain shows off his inherited Adamic sin. Cain is a type of the
unrepentant enemy of God – us – before the new birth. Abel is our type
of life after the new birth. Cain, our old human nature, versus Abel, the
God-loving spirit imparted to us, a picture of our dual nature and struggle.
Cain’s sinful
nature allowed jealousy to enter the picture and he became the first to take a
physical human life: Gen 4:8 And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it
came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his
brother, and slew him.
9 And the LORD said
unto Cain, Where [is] Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: [Am] I my
brother's keeper? 10 And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy
brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground.
Cain in further
defiance gives God a blood sacrifice in his brother. Would God have had respect
unto Cain and his offering had he been obedient? The scriptures indicate he
would. But mocking God has a price – and in this case, reaping what one has
sown, literally. Cain’s mocking curse backfires. Gen 4:11 And now [art] thou
cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's
blood from thy hand; 12 When thou tillest the ground, it shall not
henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be
in the earth. Cursed from the earth. The very cursed earth where you Cain
obtained his cursed offering. No more will you easily produce yield you could
use to mock God. As a tiller of the ground, even your livelihood shall be
against you. We always say you reap in the same garden you sow.
Yet Abel’s
obedience follows him to this day: By faith Abel offered unto God a more
excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was
righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.
Cain’s
flaunting of God was Satan’s second attempt on mankind. Throw the curse back
into the face of God, and slay the righteous servant. 1Jo
3:12 Not as Cain, [who] was of that wicked one, and slew his
brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his
brother's righteous.
Sometimes we
get so excited when we see something that supports our view we run ahead before
laying the planks before the two pillars. Cain’s works – the only ones we have
recorded in scripture, are contrasted with Abel’s. Because his own works
were evil, and his brother's righteous. That sentence alone tells us it’s
not the murder of Abel that labels Cain as evil. It’s the comparison – bringing
forth a sacrifice blatantly abhorrent to the Lord.
He knew
better. He had received the same instruction as his brother, for he knew the
timing, and it doesn’t make sense that someone would have taught him the day of
the sacrifice and not the proper accepted sacrifice.
It would be
years before the law of sacrifice would be penned down and man would learn about
blessings in obedience, and being cursed in disobedience. God didn’t give us a
day by day account of the early life of Cain and Abel; we just get a few simple
sentences in Genesis that speak volumes to us about obeying God, true
sacrifice, the consequences of Adam’s sin and depravity, jealousy, strife,
murder, blood speaking, and sin having dominion in our lives.
Cain knew better. And
usually, although we are slow to admit it, so do we.
Bro. Royce Ellis |