John
9 Verses 13-23
John 9:13 “They brought
to the Pharisees him that aforetime was blind. 14 And it was
the sabbath day when Jesus made the clay, and opened his
eyes. 15 Then again the Pharisees also asked him how he had
received his sight. He said unto them, He put clay upon mine
eyes, and I washed, and do see. 16 Therefore said some of
the Pharisees, This man is not of God, because he keepeth
not the sabbath day. Others said, How can a man that is a
sinner do such miracles? And there was a division among
them. 17 They say unto the blind man again, What sayest thou
of him, that he hath opened thine eyes? He said, He is a
prophet. 18 But the Jews did not believe concerning him,
that he had been blind, and received his sight, until they
called the parents of him that had received his sight. 19
And they asked them, saying, Is this your son, who ye say
was born blind? how then doth he now see? 20 His parents
answered them and said, We know that this is our son, and
that he was born blind: 21 But by what means he now seeth,
we know not; or who hath opened his eyes, we know not: he is
of age; ask him: he shall speak for himself. 22 These words
spake his parents, because they feared the Jews: for the
Jews had agreed already, that if any man did confess that he
was Christ, he should be put out of the synagogue. 23
Therefore said his parents, He is of age; ask him.”
From the
above we make several observations:
1. The
neighbors and others that knew the man before he was
healed of his blindness were afraid of the Pharisees,
because they knew the self-righteous tyrannical power of
the Pharisees and that the Pharisees would cast them out
of the synagogue if they did not report what the
Pharisees held as a violation of the Sabbath day.
2. The
Pharisees in asking the man how he received his sight
were looking for a violation of their perverted
interpretation of the law of the Sabbath Day.
3. The
man reported the events of the healing as they had
happened.
4. The
Pharisees had no compassion for the man who was healed,
nor even considered that the healing had to be by the
power of God. They had made their perverted
interpretation of the law their God.
5. The
Lord had previously and elsewhere told us that it was
lawful to do good on the Sabbath Day:
Matt. 12:10 “And, behold, there was a man which had
his hand withered. And they asked him, saying, Is it
lawful to heal on the sabbath days? that they might
accuse him. 11 And he said unto them, What man shall
there be among you, that shall have one sheep, and if it
fall into a pit on the sabbath day, will he not lay hold
on it, and lift it out? 12 How much then is a man better
than a sheep? Wherefore it is lawful to do well on the
sabbath days. 13 Then saith he to the man, Stretch forth
thine hand. And he stretched it forth; and it was
restored whole, like as the other.”
Therefore, we see that the
Pharisees in rescuing their sheep on the Sabbath Day
were violating their own perverted interpretation of the
law. It was never unlawful to do well on the Sabbath
days.
6. The
Pharisees accused Christ of not being of God because he
had done contrary to their perverted interpretation of
the Sabbath Day.
7. The
man who was healed declared that the one who had healed
him was a prophet. This was based on the information
that he had at the time. Later he would learn that
Jesus was the Son of God.
8. Even
among the Pharisees, however, there were some who saw
through the fallacy of their accusation and said,
“How can a man that is a sinner do such miracles?”
9. As
this miracle of healing went against their perverted
interpretation of the law of the Sabbath, they did not
believe he was born blind or that he had previously been
blind. Therefore, they asked his parents.
10. The
parents confirmed that their son was born blind, but
would not confess that they knew how he was healed.
They were afraid of being put out of the synagogue and
thus be ostracized from the society of that village.
11. The
Jews had already made it clear that if anyone confessed
that Jesus was the Christ, then they would be put out of
the synagogue.
John 9 Verses 24-34
John 9:24 “Then again
called they the man that was blind, and said unto him, Give
God the praise: we know that this man is a sinner. 25 He
answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not:
one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see. 26
Then said they to him again, What did he to thee? how opened
he thine eyes? 27 He answered them, I have told you already,
and ye did not hear: wherefore would ye hear it again? will
ye also be his disciples? 28 Then they reviled him, and
said, Thou art his disciple; but we are Moses' disciples. 29
We know that God spake unto Moses: as for this fellow, we
know not from whence he is. 30 The man answered and said
unto them, Why herein is a marvellous thing, that ye know
not from whence he is, and yet he hath opened mine eyes. 31
Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be
a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth. 32
Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened
the eyes of one that was born blind. 33 If this man were not
of God, he could do nothing. 34 They answered and said unto
him, Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach
us? And they cast him out.”
Again from
the above we can draw several observations:
1.
Pharisees called the man and said unto him,
“Give God the praise: we know that this man is a
sinner.”
The irony of this is
astounding. They acknowledge that God was responsible
for the man’s healings and then declared the one who had
administered the healing a sinner and violator of God’s
law by healing the man on the Sabbath Day.
2. The
man’s statement “I was blind, but now I see” was
probably the inspiration for the verse in John Newton’s
song “I once was lost, but now am found, was blind, but
now I see.”
3. When
they asked him again how the Lord had healed him, the
man knew they were trying to catch him in his words, and
responded by telling them that he had already told them
and now why do you ask me again, would you be his
disciples? These self-righteous Pharisees reviled the
man and said that the man was his disciple but they were
Moses disciples. They said they knew that God spoke to
Moses, but we know not whence Jesus is.
4. The
man’s response put to silence the arguments of the
Pharisees so that they accused him of being altogether
born in sins and in their arrogant self-righteous
elitist attitude declared that he wasn’t worthy to teach
them.
5. They
put him out of the synagogue because he held fast that
Jesus was of God.
6. The
elitist self-righteous Pharisees of our day will
disassociate anyone who holds to the truth whenever it
is contrary to their perverted belief system.
|